Yabasic

Everything is fast for you ...



Simple programs are compiled on the fly, larger applications have many files anyway ...

   And now you really nailed
  freePascal(Lazarus) --probably can large projects but final executable are too big
  python ..yeah...how you can make real .exe in python "with external magic" and is slow like hell
  Cerberus is just clone of Monkey aka Blitz products it is transpiler

  for really REAL projects you need C or C++
 or some of basic compilers like 
 powerBasic
 freeBasic
 oxygenBasic
 pureBasic
 and QB64 can make big projects too.

- this is proof that you don't know many things
What you mean ,,in which languages are created most popular programs for Windows
in freePascal ..no ....in BlitzMax(and derivatives) ,,No they are created in C/C++
ask more people then you will know that i have a right

yes powerbasic is dead product but still compile into the fastest exe on windows systems(thanks to turbo assembler)
freebasic is a joke ...maybe for you
oxygenbasic is assembler,compiler and linker in one dll...compile directly into machine code..is that also a joke
pureBasic maybe the oldest basic compiler
QB64 is a transpiler to C++.....why is not transpiler to python come on

python programers are not real programmers because they tend to compose differnet libs ( mostly written in C or C++)
and the crap that have large projects ...like Jango shit ...or Blender maybe
but that is good for linux
etc ..etc..etc

C or C++ : maybe but it's quite rare nowadays to use these languages for big projects

This is special for joe2874

I think , he is not a hardware person.

An example of a very large program made in C++ is Kicad
It is used in industry and in different countries.
www.kicad.org/
Schematic Capture,PCB Layout,3D Viewer

Another program is QElectroTech and made in C++ , with qt libraries
Also for industry and also used in various countries.
qelectrotech.org/

There are elecronics programs and made in C++ qt libraries

A Big project is the linuxkernel and made in C

Ok
I will start from end ...

> i'm not a pro and i program by hobby.

and who says that i am pro...i am just hobby programmer to
but not means anything wrong ..most of authors of basic interpreters or even basic compilers
are not proffesionals ..so i don't care about that at all.

then jump to start...
>when i say big project, it means a program with a graphical interface

..omg so when i made code editor which is GUI program and have simple features even is GUI that is large program
That is not problem for any Windows compiler and for most interpreters too.
So joe2874 my Aurel Edit is large program...oh good for me and is not written in
Pascal or Python or Blitzmax(transpiler) and still looking let say fine (or good)

My reference goes to Window OS ...because is the most used operating system in the world.

> Lazarus 
I don't say that Lazarus is not good ,it is but it is objectPascal as far as i know and is not for hobby programming
only in case you are very familiar with object pascal programming .

> Blitzmax has a gui module that allows to create quickly a window with gadgets and cerberus is excellent as well. try to develop this kind of program in c c++ or other languages

What you called GUI modules are just wrappers to GUI libs .
Native Windows gui is supported trough win32/64 api functions and work on all compilers under Windows OS
so win api u can use with
OxygenBasic
FreeBasic
Ok -powerBasic is dead meat -there is no support for 64bit programs
BUT you can run win32 app on win64 system without problem ..on Linux you can't
QB64 also support native win32 api too.
Thinbasic ..
IonicWindbasic former Ememrgence Basic
Purebasic of course

Also BlitzMax and CerberusX are languages oriented to game programming mostly.

>oxygenbasic : only under windows. developed by one person. if the development is stopped. you will be stuck.
yes on Windows ...that is what most people use

>purebasic : same, excellent but developed by one person. if development is stopped. you will be stuck.
as far as i know Fred is main developer but is not only one

>powerBasic : investing time in this language would be absurd in the long run.
I agree that one is dead

>freeBasic : also excellent but there are no integrated modules gui developed by the community. I use it only for small console utilities.
if your reference go for linux version ..i don't know

>QB64 : the compatibility with quickbasic is very good. for console utilities and games. yes.
...ahh you and console utilities

Just one thing as conculsion i wrote AurelBasic 2006-2009 in ..read carefully bytecode interpreter called
Creative Basic cca 12000 lines of code ..what you say about that?
and now after all this years i playing with my new experimental interpreter called micro(A)
currently have less than 2000 lines of code .

And python is probably good for small console utilities on linux
and pygame is good for small 2d games too.
Do you really beleive for example that python can replace big players like php
or Javascript on Web ...so recently that job is by webAssembly.
etc ..etc..

i agree johnno56. it's all over the place. no matter how much i explain it. it's a dialogue of the deaf. i don't have time to waste. i'm going to close this useless debate.

Not only you rosy
it looks that we all stuck ...
such a attitude ...and even better now i am deaf ..thank you!
so when i posted arguments he decide to not waste his precious time ..really?
all what i posted is prefectly clear